TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Acer Aspire XC600

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Aspire XC600  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire XC600
Memory2.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130227
Uptime4.9 Days
Run DateSep 26 '22 at 10:24
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3220-$60
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
61.1% Good
Memory 86.5
1-Core 84.2
2-Core 137
64% 103 Pts
4-Core 208
8-Core 217
28% 213 Pts
64-Core 216
13% 216 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑
This bench: 61.1%
 Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
Acer(1025 0492) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.38% Terrible
Lighting 1.5
Reflection 0.5
Parallax 1.5
1% 1.17 fps
MRender 3.2
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 2
2% 2.1 fps
Poor: 1% ↑
This bench: 1.38%
 Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSDPR-CL100-120-G2 120GB
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V4.7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 72 73 73 73 73 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41.2% Average
Read 225
Write 197
Mixed 198
SusWrite 88.8
40% 177 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 38.4
4K Mixed 13.4
68% 23.9 MB/s
DQ Read 134
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 31.3
57% 111 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑
This bench: 41.2%
 Great: 78%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LU1KDG/2G ACR16D3LU1KBG/4G 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
41.5% Average
MC Read 15
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 13
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 10.6
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 70.9
56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 10% ↑
This bench: 41.5%
 Great: 41%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Aspire XC600 Builds (Compare 296 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire XC600

CPU
Core i5-3350PIntel  $60Bench 65%, 21,413 samples55x
Core i5-3330IntelBench 61%, 51,926 samples41x
Core i7-3770Intel  $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples36x
GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples72x
GeForce GT 620NvidiaBench 2%, 17,163 samples45x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples19x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples10x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston  $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples9x
530 Series 240GBIntel  $149Bench 76%, 16,872 samples5x
RAM
ACR16D3LU1KBG/4G 2x4GBKingstonBench 47%, 1,001 samples18x
ACR512X64D3U16C11G 2x4GBKingstonBench 51%, 749 samples17x
ACR512X64D3U16C11G 1x4GBKingstonBench 26%, 480 samples17x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $88
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback