Casper CASPER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
20 months ago, 20 months ago.
SystemCasper CASPER  (all builds)
MotherboardCASPER B14
Memory2.6 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130108
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 25 '22 at 19:50
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 32%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3317U-$225
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
33.7% Below average
Memory 59.4
1-Core 56.1
2-Core 98.4
44% 71.3 Pts
4-Core 45.9
8-Core 104
9% 75.2 Pts
64-Core 77.5
5% 77.5 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Device(1B0A 20C5) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
1.76% Terrible
Lighting 2.6
Reflection 0.9
Parallax 0.8
2% 1.43 fps
MRender 1.7
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 1.5
1% 1.3 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.76%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$58
107GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 81 24 16 37 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
34.1% Below average
Read 388
Write 318
Mixed 203
SusWrite 66
54% 244 MB/s
4K Read 10.9
4K Write 19.5
4K Mixed 7.8
37% 12.7 MB/s
DQ Read 112
DQ Write 49.6
DQ Mixed 11.1
27% 57.7 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMT1950MD58E8F1333 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
27.9% Poor
MC Read 10.7
MC Write 10.2
MC Mixed 8.7
28% 9.87 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 7.3
20% 7.13 GB/s
Latency 130
31% 130 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CASPER Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Casper CASPER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $225
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback