Asrock H370M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H370M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory3.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180213
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateSep 25 '22 at 16:40
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8086K-$399
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Memory 91
1-Core 129
2-Core 254
88% 158 Pts
4-Core 412
8-Core 794
72% 603 Pts
64-Core 1,032
64% 1,032 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$245
Nvidia(10DE 1B80) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2113 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
105% Outstanding
Lighting 131
Reflection 150
Parallax 132
107% 138 fps
MRender 123
Gravity 140
Splatting 123
105% 129 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 105%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,759
Write 871
Mixed 716
244% 1,115 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 77.2
4K Mixed 43.5
147% 51.4 MB/s
DQ Read 894
DQ Write 530
DQ Mixed 694
522% 706 MB/s
Poor: 153% Great: 254%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$74
562GB free
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 661 657 687 713 707 708 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
154% Outstanding
Read 713
Write 697
Mixed 691
SusWrite 689
157% 697 MB/s
4K Read 38
4K Write 76.4
4K Mixed 47
158% 53.8 MB/s
DQ Read 824
DQ Write 729
DQ Mixed 839
612% 798 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 154%
Great: 347%
WD Elements 107C 3TB
258GB free, PID 107c
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 36 36 37 37 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
20.5% Poor
Read 54
Write 32.9
Mixed 26.7
SusWrite 36.4
48% 37.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
84% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$36
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
58.8% Above average
MC Read 24.7
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 18.5
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 18.5
46% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 65.8
61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H370M Pro4 Builds (Compare 408 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock H370M Pro4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $190
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback