Asrock H370M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H370M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory3.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180213
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 26 '22 at 12:51
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 36%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8086K-$399
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Memory 91.3
1-Core 117
2-Core 185
78% 131 Pts
4-Core 470
8-Core 833
79% 652 Pts
64-Core 1,063
66% 1,063 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
Nvidia(10DE 1B80) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2113 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
104% Outstanding
Lighting 131
Reflection 147
Parallax 133
107% 137 fps
MRender 118
Gravity 136
Splatting 123
103% 126 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 104%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,673
Write 1,230
Mixed 534
252% 1,145 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 81.4
4K Mixed 42.3
148% 52.4 MB/s
DQ Read 939
DQ Write 378
DQ Mixed 668
492% 661 MB/s
Poor: 153% Great: 254%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$74
562GB free
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 708 696 703 727 723 720 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
161% Outstanding
Read 710
Write 679
Mixed 678
SusWrite 713
157% 695 MB/s
4K Read 39.5
4K Write 87.8
4K Mixed 53.2
174% 60.2 MB/s
DQ Read 821
DQ Write 743
DQ Mixed 900
643% 821 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 161%
Great: 347%
WD Elements 107C 3TB
271GB free, PID 107c
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 37 37 37 37 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
19.7% Very poor
Read 53.1
Write 33.9
Mixed 27.7
SusWrite 36.6
48% 37.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
77% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$38
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.7% Good
MC Read 26.3
MC Write 24.8
MC Mixed 19.2
67% 23.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 26.2
SC Mixed 21.6
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 65.3
61% 65.3 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H370M Pro4 Builds (Compare 404 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock H370M Pro4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $190
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback