Gigabyte GA-B660M GAMING DDR4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics5.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive193% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B660M GAMING DDR4  (all builds)
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220808
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 25 '22 at 11:35
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-12100-$100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
96.3% Outstanding
Memory 84.5
1-Core 172
2-Core 334
105% 197 Pts
4-Core 581
8-Core 830
88% 706 Pts
64-Core 845
52% 845 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 96.3%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 730
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.101.1273
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
5.1% Terrible
Lighting 7.3
Reflection 13.7
Parallax 8.8
6% 9.93 fps
MRender 13.5
Gravity 1.2
Splatting 0.2
4% 4.97 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.1%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNVS250G 250GB
181GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S8J41100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1524 1571 157 140 115 186 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
193% Outstanding
Read 1,626
Write 1,567
Mixed 1,258
SusWrite 616
284% 1,267 MB/s
4K Read 49.5
4K Write 203
4K Mixed 48.3
244% 100 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 437
DQ Mixed 268
240% 358 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 193%
Great: 211%
PNY CS900 240GB-$20
146GB free
Firmware: CS900615
SusWrite @10s intervals: 358 169 95 95 95 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
84% Excellent
Read 448
Write 149
Mixed 341
SusWrite 151
60% 272 MB/s
4K Read 36.1
4K Write 83.1
4K Mixed 36.7
146% 52 MB/s
DQ Read 260
DQ Write 301
DQ Mixed 190
168% 250 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 84%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Apacer GD2.1827CS.00D 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
60.8% Good
MC Read 22
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 19.4
60% 20.9 GB/s
SC Read 19.2
SC Write 20.9
SC Mixed 20
57% 20 GB/s
Latency 72.6
55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B660M GAMING DDR4 Builds (Compare 1,644 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B660M GAMING DDR4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $455
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback