RM TOWER ECOQUIET 320

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 15% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	19.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	74.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago.

System	RM TOWER ECOQUIET 320 (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel DQ77CP
Memory	29.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120830
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 25 '22 at 09:48
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3570K-$30 185,516 User benchmarks, average bench 68% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	70.7% Very good	Memory 80 1-Core 98.3 2-Core 194 71% 124 Pts	4-Core 356 8-Core 357 48% 357 Pts	64-Core 345 21% 345 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 70.7% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 260X-$120 38,521 User benchmarks, average bench 20% MSI(1462 2935) CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.12.1 Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	19.4% Very poor	Lighting 24 Reflection 25 Parallax 35.3 20% 28.1 fps	MRender 21.8 Gravity 24.9 Splatting 23.4 19% 23.4 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 19.4% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$20 61,417 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 85GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS900613 SusWrite @10s intervals: 325 119 78 80 79 76 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	74.4% Very good	Read 468 Write 374 Mixed 340 SusWrite 126 73% 327 MB/s	4K Read 29.7 4K Write 60.2 4K Mixed 30.3 116% 40.1 MB/s	DQ Read 262 DQ Write 305 DQ Mixed 192 170% 253 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 74.4% Great: 91%
Toshiba MG04ACA100NY 1TB 214 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 931GB free Firmware: FK3D SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 198 198 196 198 197 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	114% Outstanding	Read 199 Write 194 Mixed 93.3 SusWrite 197 125% 171 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 1 250% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 115%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 C11 4x8GB 477 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	51.7% Above average	MC Read 18.1 MC Write 18.9 MC Mixed 16.3 51% 17.8 GB/s	SC Read 15.6 SC Write 17.4 SC Mixed 17.2 48% 16.7 GB/s	Latency 80.5 50% 80.5 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 51.7% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TOWER ECOQUIET 320 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: RM TOWER ECOQUIET 320

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	6x
Core i3-3220Intel $60Bench 52%, 71,790 samples	1x
Core i5-3570KIntel $30Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	1x

GPU
R7 250AMDBench 8%, 25,802 samples	4x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	1x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	1x

SSD
BX500 240GBCrucial $28Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	1x
CS900 240GBPNY $20Bench 73%, 61,417 samples	1x
SSDNow V300 240GBKingston $35Bench 64%, 176,713 samples	1x

RAM
HMT325U6EFR8C-PB Kingston 9905595-016.A00G Kingston 9905595-016.A00G HMT425U6CFR6A-PB 8GBHynixBench 55%, 8 samples	4x
HMT325U6EFR8C-PB HMT351U6CFR8C-PB Kingston 9905595-016.A00G 8GBHynixBench 43%, 11 samples	2x
XMS3 DDR3 1600 C11 4x8GBCorsairBench 50%, 477 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16