RM TOWER ECOQUIET 320

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 15% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	19.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	72.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

19 months ago, 19 months ago, 19 months ago, 19 months ago, 19 months ago.

System	RM TOWER ECOQUIET 320 (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel DQ77CP
Memory	29.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120830
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 25 '22 at 09:40
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	27%

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3570K-$136 185,516 User benchmarks, average bench 68% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	68.6% Good	Memory 79.6 1-Core 94.7 2-Core 150 65% 108 Pts	4-Core 337 8-Core 317 44% 327 Pts	64-Core 352 22% 352 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 68.6% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 260X-$120 38,521 User benchmarks, average bench 20% MSI(1462 2935) CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.12.1 Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	19.4% Very poor	Lighting 24 Reflection 25.1 Parallax 31.7 20% 26.9 fps	MRender 21.9 Gravity 24.9 Splatting 23.4 19% 23.4 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 19.4% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$25 61,417 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 86GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS900613 SusWrite @10s intervals: 325 207 80 65 81 73 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	72.6% Very good	Read 442 Write 302 Mixed 317 SusWrite 138 67% 300 MB/s	4K Read 28.6 4K Write 61.2 4K Mixed 29.1 113% 39.6 MB/s	DQ Read 254 DQ Write 282 DQ Mixed 182 161% 239 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 72.6% Great: 91%
Toshiba MG04ACA100NY 1TB 214 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 931GB free Firmware: FK3D SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 198 198 197 198 197 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	113% Outstanding	Read 197 Write 193 Mixed 97.2 SusWrite 197 125% 171 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 3.5 4K Mixed 1 243% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 115%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 C11 4x8GB 477 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	50.9% Above average	MC Read 18.2 MC Write 18.8 MC Mixed 16 50% 17.7 GB/s	SC Read 14.7 SC Write 16.5 SC Mixed 15.4 44% 15.5 GB/s	Latency 81.3 49% 81.3 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 50.9% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TOWER ECOQUIET 320 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: RM TOWER ECOQUIET 320

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	6x
Core i3-3220Intel $79Bench 52%, 71,790 samples	1x
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	1x

GPU
R7 250AMDBench 8%, 25,802 samples	4x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	1x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	1x

SSD
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	1x
CS900 240GBPNY $25Bench 73%, 61,417 samples	1x
SSDNow V300 240GBKingston $35Bench 64%, 176,713 samples	1x

RAM
HMT325U6EFR8C-PB Kingston 9905595-016.A00G Kingston 9905595-016.A00G HMT425U6CFR6A-PB 8GBHynixBench 55%, 8 samples	4x
HMT325U6EFR8C-PB HMT351U6CFR8C-PB Kingston 9905595-016.A00G 8GBHynixBench 43%, 11 samples	2x
XMS3 DDR3 1600 C11 4x8GBCorsairBench 50%, 477 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $326

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16