Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F17 FX706HCB_TUF706HCB

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive254% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming F17 FX706HCB_TUF706HCB  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX706HCB
Memory19.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220812
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 24 '22 at 00:21
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User IRQ-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
11th Gen Intel Core i5-11260H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Memory 64.5
1-Core 148
2-Core 289
88% 167 Pts
4-Core 508
8-Core 833
82% 670 Pts
64-Core 1,033
64% 1,033 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 85%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme INTEL SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GB
420GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1317 1321 1304 872 1021 110 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
254% Outstanding
Read 1,971
Write 1,402
Mixed 1089
SusWrite 991
304% 1,363 MB/s
4K Read 70.5
4K Write 159
4K Mixed 90.1
307% 107 MB/s
DQ Read 448
DQ Write 414
DQ Mixed 409
313% 424 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 254%
Great: 297%
Nvme KINGSTON SA2000M81000G 1TB
911GB free
Firmware: S5Z42105 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1144 1141 1132 1153 1148 1161 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
209% Outstanding
Read 997
Write 1105
Mixed 990
SusWrite 1,146
240% 1,060 MB/s
4K Read 50.6
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 67.2
220% 75.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,004
DQ Write 376
DQ Mixed 658
495% 680 MB/s
Poor: 137%
This bench: 209%
Great: 314%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43DB1-CTD Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 24GB
2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
78.1% Very good
MC Read 29.9
MC Write 31.2
MC Mixed 26.3
83% 29.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 30
SC Mixed 17.2
59% 20.7 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ASUS TUF Gaming F17 FX706HCB_TUF706HCB Builds (Compare 353 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F17 FX706HCB_TUF706HCB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback