HP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	8.48% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

19 months ago, 19 months ago.

System	HP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1495
Memory	28.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190412
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 23 '22 at 22:29
Run Duration	206 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	27%

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319 147,533 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	67.9% Good	Memory 82.5 1-Core 89 2-Core 165 66% 112 Pts	4-Core 290 8-Core 410 44% 350 Pts	64-Core 427 26% 427 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 67.9% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P400 5,817 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Nvidia(10DE 11BE) 2GB CLim: 1252 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 512.15 Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	8.48% Terrible	Lighting 10.4 Reflection 11.8 Parallax 8.9 8% 10.4 fps	MRender 9.7 Gravity 9.3 Splatting 11.6 8% 10.2 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.48% Great: 9%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SA2000M8250G 250GB 42,173 User benchmarks, average bench 171% 174GB free (System drive) Firmware: S5Z42102 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 1,290 Write 982 Mixed 124 174% 798 MB/s	4K Read 43.6 4K Write 79.5 4K Mixed 56.4 180% 59.8 MB/s	DQ Read 562 DQ Write 342 DQ Mixed 308 268% 404 MB/s
Poor: 103% Great: 236%
Transcend TS32GMTS400TPR 32GB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 6GB free Firmware: O1225G Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 266 Write 50.2 Mixed 83.5 29% 133 MB/s	4K Read 25.2 4K Write 48.7 4K Mixed 26.4 98% 33.4 MB/s	DQ Read 102 DQ Write 50.5 DQ Mixed 60.6 49% 70.9 MB/s
Poor: 32% Great: 53%
USB DISK Pro 16GB 259 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 14GB free, PID 4223 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 14.9 Write 1.7 Mixed 4.2 6% 6.93 MB/s	4K Read 3.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 14% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 10%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HP698651-154-MCN 4x8GB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	46.8% Average	MC Read 15.3 MC Write 17.2 MC Mixed 14.9 45% 15.8 GB/s	SC Read 13.5 SC Write 16.7 SC Mixed 15.3 43% 15.2 GB/s	Latency 76 53% 76 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 46.8% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC Builds (Compare 3,260 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC

CPU
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	1,669x
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples	553x
Core i7-2600Intel $191Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	545x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,776x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	275x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	238x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	123x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	54x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	49x

RAM
9905584-014.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 51%, 436 samples	38x
M378B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 45%, 4,605 samples	37x
M378B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 27%, 3,798 samples	22x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $278

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16