Samsung 550XDA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 16.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics8.41% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive30.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung 550XDA  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP550XDA-KP7BR
Memory0.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220223
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 23 '22 at 21:54
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 6305
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
16.8% Very poor
Memory 25.2
1-Core 53.4
2-Core 48
26% 42.2 Pts
4-Core 48.8
8-Core 51.4
7% 50.1 Pts
64-Core 66
4% 66 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 42%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Sanyo(144D C195) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
8.41% Terrible
Lighting 10.2
Reflection 6.1
Parallax 13
8% 9.77 fps
MRender 8.5
Gravity 8.5
Splatting 13.3
9% 10.1 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.41%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ssstc CL1-8D128 128GB
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CT22005
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 91 113 97 98 86 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
30.6% Below average
Read 370
Write 91
Mixed 287
SusWrite 93.2
46% 210 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 11.5
4K Mixed 5.4
17% 6.6 MB/s
DQ Read 155
DQ Write 57.7
DQ Mixed 126
88% 113 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 138%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
18.5% Very poor
MC Read 5.4
MC Write 9.7
MC Mixed 5.6
20% 6.9 GB/s
SC Read 3.9
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 1.4
11% 3.97 GB/s
Latency 284
14% 284 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 550XDA Builds (Compare 1,480 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 550XDA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback