Gigabyte GA-X570 GAMING X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics83.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive255% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570 GAMING X  (all builds)
Memory29.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220720
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 23 '22 at 14:04
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
97.2% Outstanding
Memory 88.8
1-Core 146
2-Core 288
95% 174 Pts
4-Core 567
8-Core 896
90% 731 Pts
64-Core 1,386
86% 1,386 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 2152 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
83.4% Excellent
Lighting 103
Reflection 114
Parallax 104
84% 107 fps
MRender 101
Gravity 99.5
Splatting 101
82% 101 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB
399GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 234100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 765 368 382 380 386 381 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
255% Outstanding
Read 2,063
Write 2,014
Mixed 1594
SusWrite 444
342% 1,529 MB/s
4K Read 59.5
4K Write 170
4K Mixed 79.8
282% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 1,438
DQ Write 1,206
DQ Mixed 1,086
878% 1,243 MB/s
Poor: 147%
This bench: 255%
Great: 271%
Samsung MZVLQ512HALU-000 512GB
87GB free
Firmware: FXV70K0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1289 298 306 307 305 305 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
199% Outstanding
Read 1,428
Write 1,025
Mixed 1,229
SusWrite 468
232% 1,038 MB/s
4K Read 50.1
4K Write 135
4K Mixed 69.7
237% 85 MB/s
DQ Read 897
DQ Write 874
DQ Mixed 703
578% 825 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 199%
Great: 203%
Wl3000gs A6472 1 3TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: MJ8O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 146 144 147 146 145 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Read 139
Write 144
Mixed 77.7
SusWrite 146
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
162% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 40.9
MC Write 27.2
MC Mixed 41.1
104% 36.4 GB/s
SC Read 29.1
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 41.9
90% 31.6 GB/s
Latency 68.7
58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 101%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 GAMING X Builds (Compare 3,966 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 GAMING X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $828
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $162Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback