Gigabyte GA-X570 GAMING X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics84.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive266% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570 GAMING X  (all builds)
Memory29.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220720
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 12 '22 at 12:51
Run Duration217 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
98% Outstanding
Memory 88.7
1-Core 148
2-Core 294
96% 177 Pts
4-Core 574
8-Core 1,112
100% 843 Pts
64-Core 1,495
92% 1,495 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 98%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 2152 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Lighting 104
Reflection 116
Parallax 105
85% 108 fps
MRender 103
Gravity 102
Splatting 102
84% 102 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB
400GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 234100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 733 360 379 385 379 383 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
266% Outstanding
Read 2,100
Write 2,051
Mixed 1,735
SusWrite 436
354% 1,581 MB/s
4K Read 64.2
4K Write 197
4K Mixed 84.4
310% 115 MB/s
DQ Read 1,457
DQ Write 1,238
DQ Mixed 1092
888% 1,262 MB/s
Poor: 147%
This bench: 266%
Great: 271%
Samsung MZVLQ512HALU-000 512GB
87GB free
Firmware: FXV70K0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1288 302 308 316 316 318 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
205% Outstanding
Read 1,430
Write 1,092
Mixed 1242
SusWrite 475
237% 1,060 MB/s
4K Read 53.3
4K Write 148
4K Mixed 74.9
255% 92.2 MB/s
DQ Read 898
DQ Write 870
DQ Mixed 714
583% 828 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 205%
Great: 203%
Wl3000gs A6472 1 3TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: MJ8O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 131 133 133 133 133 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
79.8% Very good
Read 146
Write 149
Mixed 77.7
SusWrite 133
92% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
163% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 40.1
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 40.8
103% 36 GB/s
SC Read 29.5
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 42.8
95% 33.1 GB/s
Latency 68.8
58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 101%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 GAMING X Builds (Compare 3,966 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 GAMING X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $828
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback