Lenovo ZIWB2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo ZIWB2  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO INVALID
Memory1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140923
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 23 '22 at 13:13
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4030U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Memory 79.3
1-Core 51.2
2-Core 91.8
48% 74.1 Pts
4-Core 131
8-Core 134
18% 132 Pts
64-Core 130
8% 130 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Legend(17AA 3815) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.15.4279
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
2.42% Terrible
Lighting 3
Reflection 5.5
Parallax 4.9
2% 4.47 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 2
Splatting 3.5
2% 2.83 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.42%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 240GB-$70
98GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P180831a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 251 214 205 196 217 215 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Read 393
Write 388
Mixed 377
SusWrite 216
77% 344 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 57.9
4K Mixed 32.4
120% 40.7 MB/s
DQ Read 165
DQ Write 220
DQ Mixed 232
164% 206 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
27.6% Poor
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 7.8
25% 8.83 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 8.8
24% 8.53 GB/s
Latency 81.8
49% 81.8 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ZIWB2 Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo ZIWB2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 37% - Below average Total price: $350
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback