Getac K120G2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics13.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive146% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGetac K120G2  (all builds)
MotherboardGETAC K120G2
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220216
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 22 '22 at 23:00
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
CUU5A, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
62.7% Good
Memory 61.1
1-Core 142
2-Core 242
80% 149 Pts
4-Core 389
8-Core 280
47% 335 Pts
64-Core 598
37% 598 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Device(1071 A121) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9268
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Lighting 18.2
Reflection 17.4
Parallax 17.8
15% 17.8 fps
MRender 12.8
Gravity 28.3
Splatting 0.3
10% 13.8 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ssstc CA5-8D256 256GB
189GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CQ25104
SusWrite @10s intervals: 578 268 296 323 282 284 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
146% Outstanding
Read 1,064
Write 968
Mixed 732
SusWrite 339
173% 776 MB/s
4K Read 43.9
4K Write 89.5
4K Mixed 49.6
178% 61 MB/s
DQ Read 959
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 724
514% 670 MB/s
Poor: 113%
This bench: 146%
Great: 232%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43EB1-CWE 1x16GB
1 of 8 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
40.7% Average
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 14.1
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 14.1
SC Mixed 11.5
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K120G2 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Getac K120G2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback