Acer Aspire E1-571G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire E1-571G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer EA50_HC_CR
Memory0.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit, Цвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20121204
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 22 '22 at 17:54
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3230M-$100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
50.9% Above average
Memory 75.9
1-Core 76.1
2-Core 124
57% 92.1 Pts
4-Core 151
8-Core 161
21% 156 Pts
64-Core 164
10% 164 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Acer(1025 064B) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
2.94% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 2.8
Parallax 2.7
3% 3.07 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 4.5
3% 3.27 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.94%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WALRAM 240GB
105GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1105B22P
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 37 62 63 119 219 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.8% Below average
Read 218
Write 208
Mixed 198
SusWrite 111
41% 184 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 38.6
4K Mixed 10
69% 24 MB/s
DQ Read 23
DQ Write 43.7
DQ Mixed 16.7
17% 27.8 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 58%
Seagate ST750LM022 HN-M750MBB 750GB
111GB free
Firmware: 2AR10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 73 73 74 74 75 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
43% Average
Read 76.6
Write 40.8
Mixed 45.5
SusWrite 73.2
44% 59 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
136% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 43%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6MFR8C-PB 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
26.2% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 8.1
MC Mixed 7.9
24% 8.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 7.1
24% 8.23 GB/s
Latency 88.6
45% 88.6 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire E1-571G Builds (Compare 465 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E1-571G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $127
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback