Panasonic CF-C2C6GZXKM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 21%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4.02GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4.02GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 76% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemPanasonic CF-C2C6GZXKM  (all builds)
MotherboardPanasonic CFC2W-2
Memory1.2 GB free of 4.01562 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160524
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 22 '22 at 15:39
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 59%
CPU Throttled 76%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4310U
IC1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
23.7% Poor
Memory 26.6
1-Core 41.3
2-Core 68.1
26% 45.3 Pts
4-Core 120
8-Core 120
16% 120 Pts
64-Core 118
7% 118 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Device(10F7 8338) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4624
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
0.62% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 1.6
Parallax 3.3
0% 1.67 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 1.5
Splatting 2.4
2% 2 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 0.62%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black 2.5" 160GB (2010)-$50
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 12.01A12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 44 42 40 41 37 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
26.8% Poor
Read 52.7
Write 52.5
Mixed 26
SusWrite 40.7
32% 43 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.3
67% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 51%
VendorCo ProductCode 8GB
0GB free, PID 5678
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 105
Write 5.5
Mixed 3
28% 37.8 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Mixed 0
102% 9.2 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 52GB
1600, 0 MHz
4096, 49152 MB
Relative performance (0th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
MC Read 5.3
MC Write 5.4
MC Mixed 4.6
14% 5.1 GB/s
SC Read 3.2
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 2.9
9% 3.27 GB/s
Latency 275
14% 275 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CF-C2C6GZXKM Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Panasonic CF-C2C6GZXKM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback