Asus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics20.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive24.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (98%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101116
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 22 '22 at 12:59
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 98%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T-$240
AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
48.1% Average
Memory 73.8
1-Core 32.1
2-Core 78.8
41% 61.6 Pts
4-Core 123
8-Core 220
21% 171 Pts
64-Core 271
17% 271 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6950-$290
Asus(1043 03D4) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
20.6% Poor
Lighting 27.8
Reflection 26.3
Parallax 23.4
23% 25.8 fps
MRender 21.8
Gravity 22.2
Splatting 18
17% 20.7 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
252GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 71 19 80 61 44 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
24.3% Poor
Read 384
Write 282
Mixed 101
SusWrite 56.7
45% 206 MB/s
4K Read 11.3
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 0.6
21% 5.67 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 24.3%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-4GBSR0 F3-12800CL9-4GBSR0 F3-12800CL9-4GBSR0 F3-12800CL9-4GBSR0 16GB
800, 800, 800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
25.3% Poor
MC Read 11
MC Write 5.6
MC Mixed 9.4
25% 8.67 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 6.6
16% 5.43 GB/s
Latency 92.8
43% 92.8 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3 Builds (Compare 235 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $268
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback