Asus Z9PE-D8 WS

Performance Results


Gaming 68% Battle cruiser	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 92% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	90% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Asus Z9PE-D8 WS (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK Z9PE-D8 WS
Memory	224.2 GB free of 256 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	3840 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140704
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Sep 22 '22 at 02:53
Run Duration	425 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 772 User benchmarks, average bench 64% Socket-R 2011, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	59.8% Above average	Memory 66.1 1-Core 71.4 2-Core 144 54% 93.7 Pts	4-Core 287 8-Core 610 52% 448 Pts	64-Core 2,418 150% 2,418 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 59.8% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% MSI(1462 3362) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.96 Performing below potential (51^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	102% Outstanding	Lighting 129 Reflection 137 Parallax 127 105% 131 fps	MRender 114 Gravity 135 Splatting 116 99% 121 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 429GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 299 295 299 293 279 287 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	90% Excellent	Read 429 Write 395 Mixed 397 SusWrite 292 85% 378 MB/s	4K Read 32.6 4K Write 52.6 4K Mixed 39.5 128% 41.6 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 299 DQ Mixed 330 249% 335 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 90% Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 750GB free Firmware: 2B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 282 284 281 285 293 287 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	91.4% Outstanding	Read 412 Write 375 Mixed 376 SusWrite 286 81% 362 MB/s	4K Read 33.2 4K Write 56.6 4K Mixed 41.3 133% 43.7 MB/s	DQ Read 384 DQ Write 324 DQ Mixed 350 264% 353 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 91.4% Great: 133%
Kingston SEDC1000H800G 800GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 131% 710GB free Firmware: E7FTD4.7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 986 921 994 956 964 944 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	147% Outstanding	Read 878 Write 958 Mixed 694 SusWrite 961 197% 873 MB/s	4K Read 29.7 4K Write 49.2 4K Mixed 34.5 115% 37.8 MB/s	DQ Read 469 DQ Write 305 DQ Mixed 370 281% 381 MB/s
Poor: 121% ↑ This bench: 147% Great: 147%
Kingston SEDC1000H800G 800GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 131% 724GB free Firmware: E7FTD4.7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 942 938 909 917 922 931 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	144% Outstanding	Read 871 Write 979 Mixed 707 SusWrite 927 197% 871 MB/s	4K Read 29.7 4K Write 48.2 4K Mixed 35.2 116% 37.7 MB/s	DQ Read 470 DQ Write 297 DQ Mixed 364 276% 377 MB/s
Poor: 121% ↑ This bench: 144% Great: 147%
Kingston SEDC1000H800G 800GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 131% 733GB free Firmware: E7FTD4.7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 954 952 913 912 922 919 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	144% Outstanding	Read 873 Write 986 Mixed 655 SusWrite 929 194% 861 MB/s	4K Read 27.6 4K Write 48.6 4K Mixed 35.1 112% 37.1 MB/s	DQ Read 473 DQ Write 296 DQ Mixed 361 275% 377 MB/s
Poor: 121% ↑ This bench: 144% Great: 147%
Kingston SEDC1000H800G 800GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 131% 435GB free Firmware: E7FTD4.7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 977 969 1020 1004 968 966 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	147% Outstanding	Read 857 Write 990 Mixed 727 SusWrite 984 201% 889 MB/s	4K Read 29.5 4K Write 47.8 4K Mixed 35.3 115% 37.5 MB/s	DQ Read 474 DQ Write 295 DQ Mixed 362 276% 377 MB/s
Poor: 121% ↑ This bench: 147% Great: 147%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150 38,097 User benchmarks, average bench 241% 931GB free Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1338 1203 1198 1190 1190 1189 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	214% Outstanding	Read 1,976 Write 1,192 Mixed 808 SusWrite 1,218 289% 1,299 MB/s	4K Read 34.9 4K Write 68.5 4K Mixed 40.9 142% 48.1 MB/s	DQ Read 431 DQ Write 319 DQ Mixed 336 262% 362 MB/s
Poor: 157% ↑ This bench: 214% Great: 302%
Seagate ST6000NM0004-1FT17Z 6TB 32 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 5.5TB free Firmware: NN01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 199 199 200 200 202 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	117% Outstanding	Read 209 Write 170 Mixed 83.1 SusWrite 200 121% 165 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 0.9 207% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 119%
Seagate ST6000NM0004-1FT17Z 6TB 32 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 5.5TB free Firmware: NN01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 199 199 201 199 200 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	116% Outstanding	Read 204 Write 164 Mixed 80.7 SusWrite 200 118% 162 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 3.7 4K Mixed 0.9 210% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 119%
Samsung SSD 860 PRO 4TB 1.5TB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 268 266 266 267 267 268 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	178% Outstanding	Read 280 Write 264 Mixed 271 SusWrite 267 369% 271 MB/s	4K Read 21.4 4K Write 24 4K Mixed 22.5 1,661% 22.6 MB/s	DQ Read 25.9 DQ Write 37.9 DQ Mixed 30.3 2,416% 31.4 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M386B4G70DM0-CM 8x31.9GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 8 of 8 slots used 255GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	100% Outstanding	MC Read 48.8 MC Write 39.9 MC Mixed 36.8 120% 41.8 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 5.4 19% 6.7 GB/s	Latency 111 36% 111 ns
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 108%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z9PE-D8 WS Builds (Compare 221 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 68%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 89%

Aircraft carrier

System: Asus Z9PE-D8 WS

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v21stBench 64%, 772 samples	19x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	16x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples	15x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $255Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	14x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	14x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	10x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	12x
840 Pro 256GBSamsung $190Bench 95%, 73,119 samples	11x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	10x

RAM
M393B1G73QH0-YK 8x8GBSamsungBench 81%, 8 samples	7x
HMT31GR7EFR4C-R 7x8GBHynixBench 91%, 9 samples	7x
9905403-582.A00 8x8GBKingstonBench 85%, 7 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $349

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16