HP 550-270na

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics42.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 550-270na  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 2B47
Memory4.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160317
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 21 '22 at 19:43
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
73% Very good
Memory 82.5
1-Core 108
2-Core 199
74% 130 Pts
4-Core 344
8-Core 489
52% 417 Pts
64-Core 489
30% 489 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 73%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 516.94
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.1% Average
Lighting 58.7
Reflection 90.1
Parallax 52.2
48% 67 fps
MRender 65.2
Gravity 64.5
Splatting 0.2
31% 43.3 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 64 118 94 106 109 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
66.7% Good
Read 141
Write 140
Mixed 90.8
SusWrite 91
86% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
163% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 84%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87
6.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 172 174 170 171 171 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
81.8% Excellent
Read 114
Write 137
Mixed 65.2
SusWrite 171
89% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.7
214% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73EB0-YK0 M378B5173EB0-YK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
53% Above average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 16.3
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 17.1
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 76.1
53% 76.1 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 53%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 550-270na Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

System: HP 550-270na

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $383
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback