MSI B450 Tomahawk

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive29.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
21 months ago, 21 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C02
MotherboardMSI B450 Tomahawk  (all builds)
Memory34.6 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190705
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 21 '22 at 01:03
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Memory 61.6
1-Core 125
2-Core 244
77% 144 Pts
4-Core 461
8-Core 692
72% 576 Pts
64-Core 942
58% 942 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 92%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1Z40102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 100 51 4.7 103 76 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
29.8% Poor
Read 326
Write 291
Mixed 21.5
SusWrite 97.8
41% 184 MB/s
4K Read 14.9
4K Write 11.3
4K Mixed 0.9
30% 9.03 MB/s
DQ Read 123
DQ Write 5.3
DQ Mixed 0.8
16% 42.9 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
66GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 159 171 164 143 102 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Read 120
Write 160
Mixed 60.2
SusWrite 149
89% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.3
88% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 48GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
63.2% Good
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 25.5
66% 23.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 19.7
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 123
32% 123 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C02) Builds (Compare 7,369 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer

Motherboard: MSI B450 Tomahawk - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $666
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback