Fujitsu FMVS02002

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemFujitsu FMVS02002  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNB272
Memory1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141117
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 19 '22 at 14:05
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4300U
Onboard, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
51.5% Above average
Memory 81.2
1-Core 57.6
2-Core 97.1
51% 78.6 Pts
4-Core 130
8-Core 131
18% 130 Pts
64-Core 130
8% 130 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Fujitsu(10CF 1814) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4549
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
1.97% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 4.1
2% 2.57 fps
MRender 4.7
Gravity 1.4
Splatting 3.1
2% 3.07 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.97%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545032A7E685 320GB
126GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GGBOA8D0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 47 52 47 53 54 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
35.2% Below average
Read 72.2
Write 30.3
Mixed 21.1
SusWrite 50.3
32% 43.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
108% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4KTF25664HZ-1G6E1 4GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
44.9% Average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 14.9
45% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 14.2
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 78.4
51% 78.4 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FMVS02002 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu FMVS02002

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback