Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 43% Speed boat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	16.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	48.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium E5700-$22 20,872 User benchmarks, average bench 36% LGA 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	31.5% Below average	Memory 49 1-Core 45.1 2-Core 56.9 33% 50.3 Pts	4-Core 83.9 8-Core 75.7 11% 79.8 Pts	64-Core 73.5 4% 73.5 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 31.5% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Asus(1043 84AC) 2GB CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 516.59 Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	16.3% Very poor	Lighting 20 Reflection 17.5 Parallax 20 16% 19.2 fps	MRender 23.8 Gravity 21.9 Splatting 16.1 16% 20.6 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 16.3% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra Plus 128GB-$75 16,709 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 44GB free (System drive) Firmware: X2316RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 146 162 144 148 131 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	48.5% Average	Read 218 Write 190 Mixed 114 SusWrite 145 37% 167 MB/s	4K Read 23.1 4K Write 48.8 4K Mixed 24.7 92% 32.2 MB/s	DQ Read 28.2 DQ Write 84.1 DQ Mixed 32.2 32% 48.2 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 48.5% Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$80 31,610 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 182GB free Firmware: 3.AAE SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 38 38 38 37 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	32.4% Below average	Read 75.2 Write 32.3 Mixed 39.2 SusWrite 37.4 34% 46 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.8 145% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 32.4% Great: 43%
Seagate ST3250620A 250GB-$80 471 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 56GB free Firmware: 3.AAE SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 38 38 38 37 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	23.6% Poor	Read 44.6 Write 46 Mixed 33.1 SusWrite 37.4 30% 40.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.7 126% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 23.6% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6GB 111,301 User benchmarks, average bench 25% null MHz 2048, 1024, 2048, 1024 MB Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	12.9% Very poor	MC Read 5 MC Write 3.7 MC Mixed 3.7 12% 4.13 GB/s	SC Read 3.2 SC Write 3.5 SC Mixed 4.1 10% 3.6 GB/s	Latency 164 24% 164 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.9% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 37%

Jet ski

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 6400IntelBench 35%, 5,556 samples	3x
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	3x
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples	2x

GPU
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	2x
GTX 660-TiNvidia $362Bench 26%, 42,960 samples	2x
GeForce 7600 GSNvidiaBench 1%, 1,208 samples	2x

SSD
SPCCSolidStateDisk 512GBBench 67%, 417 samples	2x
Ultra Plus 128GBSanDisk $75Bench 77%, 16,709 samples	1x
840 Evo 120GBSamsung $85Bench 91%, 104,444 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16