Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 104% UFO	Desktop 105% UFO	Workstation 116% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	97.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	354% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

22 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	23 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20220428
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 18 '22 at 12:27
Run Duration	190 Seconds
Run User	MYS-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$260 60,132 User benchmarks, average bench 99% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Memory 90.9 1-Core 152 2-Core 302 99% 182 Pts	4-Core 606 8-Core 1,201 107% 903 Pts	64-Core 2,196 136% 2,196 Pts
Poor: 87% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 108%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210 663,603 User benchmarks, average bench 115% Nvidia(10DE 139F) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.94 Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (120 fps cap detected)	97.3% Outstanding	Lighting 120 Reflection 120 Parallax 120 98% 120 fps	MRender 120 Gravity 120 Splatting 115 96% 118 fps
Poor: 105% ↑ This bench: 97.3% Great: 123%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SFYRS1000G 1TB 17,374 User benchmarks, average bench 389% 557GB free (System drive) Firmware: EIFK31.6 SusWrite @10s intervals: 3049 1695 1191 801 869 906 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	354% Outstanding	Read 2615 Write 4,567 Mixed 3,167 SusWrite 1,418 666% 2,942 MB/s	4K Read 76.3 4K Write 216 4K Mixed 110 370% 134 MB/s	DQ Read 1,230 DQ Write 906 DQ Mixed 1,064 796% 1,067 MB/s
Poor: 247% ↑ This bench: 354% Great: 573%
WD WD60EZAZ-00ZGHB0 6TB 1,497 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 2.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 137 140 137 140 138 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 23% Great: 101%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
OCPC MMX3A2K32GD436C18 2x16GB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	128% Outstanding	MC Read 65.3 MC Write 43.6 MC Mixed 36.8 139% 48.6 GB/s	SC Read 27.2 SC Write 26.1 SC Mixed 37.5 86% 30.3 GB/s	Latency 66 61% 66 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 128% Great: 122%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,884 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $105

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $190Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	1,312x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $120Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	877x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $180Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	840x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	575x
RTX 3080Nvidia $700Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	519x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	407x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $102Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	343x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $105Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	277x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $69Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	266x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	242x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	143x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	142x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $937

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16