Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 120%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 132%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics113% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive392% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory21 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220428
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 14 '22 at 17:12
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$260
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 92.3
1-Core 171
2-Core 325
106% 196 Pts
4-Core 610
8-Core 1,091
102% 850 Pts
64-Core 2,280
141% 2,280 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 103%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
Nvidia(10DE 139F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
113% Outstanding
Lighting 145
Reflection 145
Parallax 148
118% 146 fps
MRender 181
Gravity 130
Splatting 115
113% 142 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 113%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SFYRS1000G 1TB
543GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EIFK31.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3492 1570 1522 1604 962 835 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
392% Outstanding
Read 3,036
Write 4681
Mixed 3,159
SusWrite 1,664
708% 3,135 MB/s
4K Read 68.2
4K Write 244
4K Mixed 114
378% 142 MB/s
DQ Read 1,324
DQ Write 958
DQ Mixed 1,236
898% 1,173 MB/s
Poor: 247%
This bench: 392%
Great: 573%
WD WD60EZAZ-00ZGHB0 6TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 140 142 140 142 141 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 23% Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
OCPC MMX3A2K32GD436C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
125% Outstanding
MC Read 61.1
MC Write 43.4
MC Mixed 35.5
133% 46.7 GB/s
SC Read 31.2
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 38.7
92% 32.1 GB/s
Latency 63.6
63% 63.6 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 125%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,884 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $105

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $938
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback