HP Z6 G4 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 138%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics152% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive278% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory384GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 384GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z6 G4 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81C6
Memory357.7 GB free of 384 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220719
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 18 '22 at 10:57
Run Duration421 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Gold 6253CL
CPU0, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
69.6% Good
Memory 68.8
1-Core 94.4
2-Core 190
66% 118 Pts
4-Core 377
8-Core 746
66% 562 Pts
64-Core 2,244
139% 2,244 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
HP(103C 8550) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
152% Outstanding
Lighting 200
Reflection 191
Parallax 233
163% 208 fps
MRender 265
Gravity 202
Splatting 165
167% 211 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 152%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP EX950 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$180
191GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42A0S63C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1503 1428 1139 1229 1226 1221 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
278% Outstanding
Read 2,414
Write 2,194
Mixed 246
SusWrite 1,291
341% 1,536 MB/s
4K Read 54.6
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 71.3
235% 80.1 MB/s
DQ Read 801
DQ Write 531
DQ Mixed 585
458% 639 MB/s
Poor: 194%
This bench: 278%
Great: 379%
HP EX950 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$180
421GB free
Firmware: 42A0S63C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1844 1252 1255 1254 1255 1260 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
298% Outstanding
Read 2,528
Write 2260
Mixed 247
SusWrite 1,353
355% 1,597 MB/s
4K Read 58.6
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 79.1
262% 91.4 MB/s
DQ Read 875
DQ Write 584
DQ Mixed 580
473% 680 MB/s
Poor: 194%
This bench: 298%
Great: 379%
HP EX950 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 42AAT8KA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1639 1318 1111 1109 1114 1109 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
287% Outstanding
Read 2,506
Write 2262
Mixed 1,653
SusWrite 1,233
428% 1,914 MB/s
4K Read 53.9
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 73
240% 82.8 MB/s
DQ Read 951
DQ Write 691
DQ Mixed 657
536% 766 MB/s
Poor: 202%
This bench: 287%
Great: 407%
HP EX950 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$180
6GB free
Firmware: 42A0S63C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2529
Write 2,226
Mixed 246
366% 1,667 MB/s
4K Read 59.3
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 79.4
262% 90.8 MB/s
DQ Read 872
DQ Write 576
DQ Mixed 586
474% 678 MB/s
Poor: 194% Great: 379%
HP EX950 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 42A0S63C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2167 2166 2179 2172 2175 2176 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
344% Outstanding
Read 2464
Write 2,202
Mixed 248
SusWrite 2,173
396% 1,772 MB/s
4K Read 56
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 74.9
245% 84.2 MB/s
DQ Read 936
DQ Write 680
DQ Mixed 582
496% 733 MB/s
Poor: 202%
This bench: 344%
Great: 407%
WD WUH721414ALE604 14TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: LDAZW110
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 132 128 130 128 128 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 65% Great: 140%
WD WUH721414ALE604 14TB
631GB free
Firmware: LDAZW110
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 137 131 133 134 130 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 65% Great: 140%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAA8GL7AMR4N-VK 6x31.8GB
6 of 6 slots used
191GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
165% Outstanding
MC Read 59
MC Write 87.8
MC Mixed 62.3
199% 69.7 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 19.5
SC Mixed 9.8
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 165%
Great: 165%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z6 G4 Workstation Builds (Compare 632 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht

System: HP Z6 G4 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback