HP Z840 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics28.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z840 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2129
Memory56.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201104
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 18 '22 at 00:18
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v4
CPU0, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
64.2% Good
Memory 76.3
1-Core 70.6
2-Core 140
57% 95.8 Pts
4-Core 281
8-Core 560
50% 420 Pts
64-Core 1,790
111% 1,790 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 8613) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.8% Poor
Lighting 36.4
Reflection 40.2
Parallax 37.4
30% 38 fps
MRender 36.8
Gravity 38
Splatting 27
27% 33.9 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 512GB
272GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 240 161 166 166 164 164 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
66.3% Good
Read 310
Write 235
Mixed 241
SusWrite 177
54% 241 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 51.8
4K Mixed 27.5
100% 34.7 MB/s
DQ Read 269
DQ Write 286
DQ Mixed 185
165% 247 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 102%
Seagate ST32000644NS 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 130A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 115 116 115 116 115 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
64.1% Good
Read 108
Write 112
Mixed 70.2
SusWrite 115
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 74%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
158GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 195 199 196 195 198 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
94.1% Outstanding
Read 132
Write 109
Mixed 77.6
SusWrite 197
94% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
358GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 152 149 142 149 154 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Read 49.9
Write 90.3
Mixed 73.6
SusWrite 148
67% 90.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.5
184% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 90%
Seagate USB 3TB
2TB free
Firmware: 050B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 20 20 20 20 20 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
16.6% Very poor
Read 36.6
Write 39
Mixed 33.2
SusWrite 20.2
24% 32.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
207% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 90%
WD My Book 1140 3TB
333GB free, PID 1140
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 19 18 18 18 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
16.9% Very poor
Read 50.4
Write 36.7
Mixed 26.6
SusWrite 18.5
41% 33.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
94% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA41GR7AFR4N-TF 8x8GB
8 of 16 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
92.5% Outstanding
MC Read 43.2
MC Write 31.9
MC Mixed 35.8
106% 37 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 14.9
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 87.8
46% 87.8 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z840 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,978 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

System: HP Z840 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 114% - Outstanding Total price: $99
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback