| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 29.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 37.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Foxconn H55M-S (all builds) |
| Memory | 8.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 0 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20110302 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 17 '22 at 13:52 |
| Run Duration | 169 Seconds |
| Run User | IDN-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
68%
Good
|
66% 108 Pts
|
38% 300 Pts
|
22% 348 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 378E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.7%
Poor
|
30% 39.3 fps
|
28% 35.2 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel SSDSC2BF180A5H SED 180GB
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LTRi
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 116 133 121 119 112 MB/s
|
37.8%
Below average
|
34% 151 MB/s
|
71% 25.3 MB/s
|
26% 41.5 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
6GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 63 64 64 64 64 MB/s
|
43.9%
Average
|
50% 67.2 MB/s
|
174% 1.13 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$38
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 179 179 182 179 181 MB/s
|
103%
Outstanding
|
103% 142 MB/s
|
152% 1.07 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 12GB
0, 0 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
25.3%
Poor
|
21% 7.37 GB/s
|
26% 9 GB/s
|
59% 68.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H55M-S Builds (Compare 37 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Foxconn H55M-S
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples | 9x |
| Core i3 540Intel $60Bench 46%, 24,563 samples | 7x |
| Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples | 7x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 4x |
| HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples | 3x |
| GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 44% - Average | Total price: $209 |