Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X571GT_X571GT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive161% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X571GT_X571GT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X571GT
Memory16.1 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201217
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 17 '22 at 13:49
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
77.5% Very good
Memory 85.5
1-Core 121
2-Core 244
84% 150 Pts
4-Core 378
8-Core 527
57% 453 Pts
64-Core 499
31% 499 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 1A81) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6617
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6% Terrible
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 63.4
Parallax 7.3
5% 25.7 fps
MRender 9.7
Gravity 6.1
Splatting 10.6
7% 8.8 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$58
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 764 862 875 85 510 62 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
161% Outstanding
Read 943
Write 878
Mixed 768
SusWrite 526
175% 779 MB/s
4K Read 50.1
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 64
225% 80.4 MB/s
DQ Read 328
DQ Write 651
DQ Mixed 216
242% 398 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 161%
Great: 209%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905712-035.A00G 20GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
72.7% Very good
MC Read 28.1
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 21.5
73% 25.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 22.4
67% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 71.6
56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X571GT_X571GT Builds (Compare 744 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X571GT_X571GT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $58
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback