Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics79.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive178% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220428
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateSep 16 '22 at 15:26
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 28%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$150
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Memory 80.6
1-Core 112
2-Core 209
76% 134 Pts
4-Core 402
8-Core 645
64% 524 Pts
64-Core 865
54% 865 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
Zotac(19DA 4527) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
79.8% Very good
Lighting 102
Reflection 101
Parallax 92.7
83% 98.6 fps
MRender 99.5
Gravity 93
Splatting 79.9
73% 90.8 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
XPG GAMMIX S11 Pro 256GB
127GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0906I
SusWrite @10s intervals: 465 254 253 256 254 256 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
178% Outstanding
Read 2,210
Write 945
Mixed 1,051
SusWrite 290
247% 1124 MB/s
4K Read 46.7
4K Write 73.1
4K Mixed 53.9
178% 57.9 MB/s
DQ Read 452
DQ Write 299
DQ Mixed 392
288% 381 MB/s
Poor: 141%
This bench: 178%
Great: 277%
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$130
139GB free
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 366 231 231 235 233 235 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
93.1% Outstanding
Read 493
Write 467
Mixed 343
SusWrite 255
87% 390 MB/s
4K Read 33.9
4K Write 61.6
4K Mixed 40.7
136% 45.4 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 311
DQ Mixed 337
255% 344 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 93.1%
Great: 114%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 32GB-$8
24GB free, PID 5591
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 138
Write 95.3
Mixed 107
139% 113 MB/s
4K Read 5.6
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 4.2
272% 4.33 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3000 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 41.9
MC Write 37.1
MC Mixed 34.1
108% 37.7 GB/s
SC Read 25.7
SC Write 37.9
SC Mixed 30.2
89% 31.3 GB/s
Latency 79.3
50% 79.3 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 104%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,037 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $452
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback