Dell Precision Tower 7810

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive130% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
20 months ago, 20 months ago.
SystemDell Precision Tower 7810
MotherboardDell Precision Tower 7810  (all builds)
Memory119.2 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180625
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateSep 16 '22 at 09:31
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 28 cores, 56 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
68.2% Good
Memory 65.8
1-Core 104
2-Core 207
69% 126 Pts
4-Core 378
8-Core 743
66% 560 Pts
64-Core 3381
209% 3381 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 74%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSN5512GPUK NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
257GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5KDA4101 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 404 346 348 279 342 349 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Read 886
Write 936
Mixed 664
SusWrite 345
159% 708 MB/s
4K Read 17.8
4K Write 93.8
4K Mixed 51.3
142% 54.3 MB/s
DQ Read 744
DQ Write 494
DQ Mixed 557
432% 598 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 130%
Great: 170%
Truenas iSCSI Disk 1TB
702GB free
Firmware: 0123
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 84 83 84 81 84 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
48.8% Average
Read 83.7
Write 81
Mixed 88.6
SusWrite 83.2
63% 84.1 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 5.8
4K Mixed 6
1,012% 5.83 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 49%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49
2TB free
Firmware: CC54
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 152 151 151 150 153 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Read 146
Write 116
Mixed 72.5
SusWrite 151
89% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GR7MFR8N-UH 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB RIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
134% Outstanding
MC Read 61.5
MC Write 53.2
MC Mixed 51.1
158% 55.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 15.2
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 97%
This bench: 134%
Great: 137%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision Tower 7810 Builds (Compare 1,750 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 7810

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 30% - Below average Total price: $68
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback