TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asrock B365M IB-R

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics96.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive93.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock B365M IB-R  (all builds)
Memory23 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190726
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 16 '22 at 02:38
Run Duration219 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700F-$279
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Memory 64.8
1-Core 128
2-Core 258
80% 150 Pts
4-Core 537
8-Core 813
84% 675 Pts
64-Core 790
49% 790 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑
This bench: 82.4%
 Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510
MSI(1462 C757) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
96.4% Outstanding
Lighting 116
Reflection 106
Parallax 122
95% 115 fps
MRender 164
Gravity 111
Splatting 100
99% 125 fps
Poor: 90% ↑
This bench: 96.4%
 Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
684GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR045
SusWrite @10s intervals: 274 380 399 404 411 383 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
93.7% Outstanding
Read 337
Write 406
Mixed 345
SusWrite 375
83% 366 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 77.2
4K Mixed 42.7
135% 48.7 MB/s
DQ Read 367
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 157
165% 273 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑
This bench: 93.7%
 Great: 125%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$45
1TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 198 201 192 200 198 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 154
Write 150
Mixed 74.6
SusWrite 197
105% 144 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.1
104% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑
This bench: 100%
 Great: 106%
WD WD101EDAZ-11 10TB
6.5TB free
Firmware: 81.00A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 152 162 163 165 160 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
81.2% Excellent
Read 124
Write 170
Mixed 60.3
SusWrite 159
93% 128 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 1.1
253% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑
This bench: 81.2%
 Great: 118%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown NMUD480E82-2666 029E CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 89AD NMUD480E82-2666 029E CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
64.2% Good
MC Read 23.9
MC Write 26.4
MC Mixed 21.6
68% 24 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 20.6
SC Mixed 13.4
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 64% ↑
This bench: 64.2%
 Great: 73%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical B365M IB-R Builds (Compare 3,306 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock B365M IB-R

CPU
Core i7-9700FIntel  $279Bench 92%, 54,980 samples2,216x
Core i5-9400FIntel  $85Bench 85%, 299,482 samples869x
Core i7-9700KIntel  $264Bench 97%, 550,833 samples63x
GPU
RTX 2060S (Super)Nvidia  $510Bench 100%, 319,148 samples1,193x
GTX 1660Nvidia  $200Bench 68%, 230,793 samples703x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia  $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples530x
SSD
SU630 480GBAdataBench 67%, 31,107 samples569x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples299x
Green 480GB (2018)WD  $69Bench 48%, 25,452 samples251x
RAM
NMUD480E82-2666 2x8GBUnknownBench 79%, 1,847 samples432x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples342x
D12.2356WS.001 2x8GBUnknownBench 80%, 1,120 samples236x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $789
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback