MSI MPG Z390 GAMING EDGE AC (MS-7B17)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 211%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 191%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics220% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive58.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B17
MotherboardMSI MPG Z390 GAMING EDGE AC (MS-7B17)  (all builds)
Memory23.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200611
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 16 '22 at 02:04
Run Duration263 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$264
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
97.6% Outstanding
Memory 95.4
1-Core 143
2-Core 287
97% 175 Pts
4-Core 536
8-Core 957
90% 746 Pts
64-Core 929
58% 929 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 97.6%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4975 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
220% Outstanding
Lighting 332
Reflection 290
Parallax 329
271% 317 fps
MRender 353
Gravity 260
Splatting 186
209% 266 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 220%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 68 59 51 64 34 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
58.6% Above average
Read 301
Write 69.9
Mixed 113
SusWrite 58.3
30% 136 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 72.2
4K Mixed 26.9
110% 41.3 MB/s
DQ Read 336
DQ Write 90.1
DQ Mixed 120
112% 182 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 134%
XPG GAMMIX S11 Pro 1TB
122GB free
Firmware: 42A4SANA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 976 907 985 973 982 996 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
186% Outstanding
Read 1,852
Write 1,419
Mixed 211
SusWrite 970
247% 1,113 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 66.3
4K Mixed 37.4
116% 41.9 MB/s
DQ Read 597
DQ Write 123
DQ Mixed 322
246% 347 MB/s
Poor: 185%
This bench: 186%
Great: 373%
Crucial P5 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$220
2TB free
Firmware: P4CR311 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2131 2123 2221 2137 2154 2156 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
362% Outstanding
Read 2,411
Write 1,176
Mixed 1,608
SusWrite 2,154
411% 1,837 MB/s
4K Read 48.3
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 66.3
218% 76.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,699
DQ Write 1,267
DQ Mixed 1,454
1,095% 1,473 MB/s
Poor: 162%
This bench: 362%
Great: 389%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$85
447GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 115 137 134 138 140 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
41.5% Average
Read 13.5
Write 34.1
Mixed 24.3
SusWrite 131
37% 50.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.4
67% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 114%
SanDisk USB Flash Drive 123GB
115GB free, PID 5584
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 23 23 15 16 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Read 35.7
Write 19.5
Mixed 20.4
SusWrite 20.1
30% 23.9 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1.3
116% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
MC Read 37.9
MC Write 38.3
MC Mixed 27.8
99% 34.7 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 35.5
SC Mixed 25.3
74% 25.9 GB/s
Latency 56
72% 56 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG Z390 GAMING EDGE AC (MS-7B17) Builds (Compare 14,369 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG Z390 GAMING EDGE AC (MS-7B17) - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 114% - Outstanding Total price: $817
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback