| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 36.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-B85M-D3H (all builds) |
| Memory | 19.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20150820 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 15 '22 at 09:33 |
| Run Duration | 222 Seconds |
| Run User | PAK-User |
| Background CPU | 6% |
PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
|
75.4%
Very good
|
75% 130 Pts
|
55% 447 Pts
|
34% 541 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 516.59
|
17.6%
Very poor
|
18% 20.6 fps
|
18% 22.1 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Transcend TS500GSSD220Q 500GB
256GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0910A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 199 206 206 36 17 MB/s
|
36.4%
Below average
|
32% 145 MB/s
|
54% 27.1 MB/s
|
36% 83.9 MB/s
|
|
Toshiba DT01ABA200V 2TB
302GB free
Firmware: MZ4OABN0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 15 14 14 14 18 MB/s
|
||||
|
Seagate SkyHawk 4TB (2016)-$95
2.5TB free
Firmware: CV11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 150 139 148 148 149 MB/s
|
74.4%
Very good
|
82% 112 MB/s
|
149% 1.1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 99U5471-036.A00LF 3x8GB
3 of 4 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
54.7%
Above average
|
54% 18.7 GB/s
|
50% 17.4 GB/s
|
56% 71.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical GA-B85M-D3H Builds (Compare 3,807 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B85M-D3H - $58
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 507x |
| Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 501x |
| Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples | 475x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 474x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 227x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 224x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $296 |