Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	35.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3320M-$199 30,496 User benchmarks, average bench 48% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	57.4% Above average	Memory 79 1-Core 85.5 2-Core 139 61% 101 Pts	4-Core 210 8-Core 209 28% 210 Pts	64-Core 208 13% 208 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 57.4% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Legend(17AA 21F3) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5069 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	3.53% Terrible	Lighting 4 Reflection 2 Parallax 2.9 3% 2.97 fps	MRender 4.5 Gravity 2.5 Splatting 7 4% 4.67 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.53% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$53 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 75GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF450000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 21 3.6 1.6 14 43 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	35.7% Below average	Read 405 Write 331 Mixed 227 SusWrite 47.4 56% 253 MB/s	4K Read 15.5 4K Write 17.4 4K Mixed 10.7 46% 14.5 MB/s	DQ Read 115 DQ Write 4.5 DQ Mixed 38.6 33% 52.8 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 35.7% Great: 55%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351S6EFR8C-PB 859B CT51264BF160BJ.M8F 8GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	49.5% Average	MC Read 18.1 MC Write 17.9 MC Mixed 15.7 49% 17.2 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 14.3 42% 14.7 GB/s	Latency 82.5 48% 82.5 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 49.5% Great: 53%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i5-3320MIntel $199Bench 48%, 30,496 samples	5x
Core i7-3840QMIntel $549Bench 66%, 3,981 samples	2x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	7x

SSD
Green 240GB (2018)WD $53Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	2x
MX500 500GBCrucial $53Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	2x
MZ7TD128HAFV-000L1 128GBSamsungBench 55%, 4,607 samples	1x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 2133 C11 2x8GBKingstonBench 67%, 701 samples	2x
M471B1G73EB0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 52%, 10,651 samples	1x
HMT351S6EFR8C-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 28%, 3,567 samples	1x

Value: 43% - Average

Total price: $252