PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 43.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus X99-A II (all builds) |
Memory | 55.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | Цвета: 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190710 |
Uptime | 12.8 Days |
Run Date | Sep 14 '22 at 13:39 |
Run Duration | 278 Seconds |
Run User | RUS-User |
Background CPU | 6% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v4
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
|
79.5%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 497.09
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
43.4%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
224GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 311 305 306 306 311 309 MB/s
|
109%
Outstanding
|
|||
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
209GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 467 459 462 457 433 344 MB/s
|
121%
Outstanding
|
|||
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$150
1TB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1914 1854 1729 1794 1557 1431 MB/s
|
301%
Outstanding
|
|||
Storejet Transcend 1TB
11GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 42 41 42 42 MB/s
|
22.5%
Poor
|
|||
ZALMAN ZM-VE350 320GB
6GB free, PID 3e40
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 62 71 58 65 66 MB/s
|
27.5%
Poor
|
|||
TOSHIBA HDWD130 3TB
608GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 42 44 43 44 43 MB/s
|
21.7%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3600 C17 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
134%
Outstanding
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples | 699x |
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples | 196x |
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples | 190x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 216x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 182x |
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 108x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 97% - Outstanding | Total price: $682 |