MSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics58.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive99.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C52
MotherboardMSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)  (all builds)
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201207
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateSep 14 '22 at 12:31
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$78
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Memory 84.3
1-Core 137
2-Core 269
90% 163 Pts
4-Core 476
8-Core 788
77% 632 Pts
64-Core 1,064
66% 1,064 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1609 MHz, MLim: 2005 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
58.5% Above average
Lighting 73.2
Reflection 77.9
Parallax 69.6
60% 73.6 fps
MRender 78.5
Gravity 69.8
Splatting 61.3
56% 69.9 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 393 176 165 96 74 59 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
99.4% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 482
Mixed 336
SusWrite 160
83% 371 MB/s
4K Read 38.7
4K Write 98.7
4K Mixed 50.2
175% 62.5 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 249
210% 308 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 99.4%
Great: 101%
WD Blue 2.5" 750GB-$71
194GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 80.8
Mixed 53.7
51% 67.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 22% Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL8G30C15U4BL.M8FE1 Kingston KHX3200C16D4/8GX 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
MC Read 35.1
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 35.1
90% 31.4 GB/s
SC Read 25.8
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 33.7
79% 27.8 GB/s
Latency 73
55% 73 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52) Builds (Compare 3,015 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $297
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback