Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 196%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 171%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics217% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive295% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS IX CODE  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 14 '22 at 11:53
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$235
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
Memory 95.3
1-Core 140
2-Core 274
95% 170 Pts
4-Core 476
8-Core 782
77% 629 Pts
64-Core 769
48% 769 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
217% Outstanding
Lighting 322
Reflection 297
Parallax 333
263% 317 fps
MRender 356
Gravity 264
Splatting 192
212% 271 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 217%
Great: 230%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SKC3000D2048G 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: EIFK31.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1895 2027 1974 2067 2092 335 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
295% Outstanding
Read 2,072
Write 2,210
Mixed 2,112
SusWrite 1,732
458% 2,031 MB/s
4K Read 63.3
4K Write 82.7
4K Mixed 75
236% 73.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,345
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 254
307% 574 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 295%
Great: 614%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
99.4% Outstanding
MC Read 36.5
MC Write 38.3
MC Mixed 30.2
100% 35 GB/s
SC Read 23
SC Write 42
SC Mixed 30.4
91% 31.8 GB/s
Latency 56.2
71% 56.2 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 99.4%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS IX CODE Builds (Compare 1,318 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE - $279

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $1,114
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback