Empty empty

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics118% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive36.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory80GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 80GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
21 months ago, 21 months ago.
SystemEmpty empty  (all builds)
MotherboardTYAN S7012
Memory69.1 GB free of 80 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20110923
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 13 '22 at 22:02
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5690
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.45 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Memory 88.2
1-Core 86.2
2-Core 175
69% 116 Pts
4-Core 321
8-Core 630
56% 475 Pts
64-Core 1,245
77% 1,245 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6700-XT-$480
XFX(1EAE 6606) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 12GB, Driver: 22.8.2
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
118% Outstanding
Lighting 130
Reflection 122
Parallax 287
106% 180 fps
MRender 224
Gravity 144
Splatting 198
154% 188 fps
Poor: 113%
This bench: 118%
Great: 129%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100
34GB free
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 147 148 149 153 148 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
49.1% Average
Read 210
Write 194
Mixed 187
SusWrite 149
42% 185 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 29.6
4K Mixed 27.9
93% 28.3 MB/s
DQ Read 39.3
DQ Write 77.9
DQ Mixed 50.2
40% 55.8 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 137%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137
219GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 143 144 146 151 146 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.8% Below average
Read 201
Write 192
Mixed 145
SusWrite 145
38% 171 MB/s
4K Read 13.2
4K Write 27.1
4K Mixed 18.1
58% 19.5 MB/s
DQ Read 22.3
DQ Write 58.2
DQ Mixed 22.2
22% 34.2 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 133%
Toshiba Q300 480GB-$152
160GB free
Firmware: SAFM12.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 147 142 103 132 147 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.3% Below average
Read 213
Write 201
Mixed 159
SusWrite 136
40% 177 MB/s
4K Read 14.9
4K Write 28.7
4K Mixed 16.9
59% 20.2 MB/s
DQ Read 21.7
DQ Write 70.3
DQ Mixed 21.9
24% 38 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 99%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
947GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 105 100 100 104 109 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
66.1% Good
Read 127
Write 118
Mixed 62.1
SusWrite 103
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
180% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 101%
Lacie 2Big Quadra v3 10TB
1TB free
Firmware: 051E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 23 23 23 24 23 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Read 32.4
Write 28.5
Mixed 21.9
SusWrite 23.1
20% 26.5 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.3
166% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0-YH9 M393B1K70CH0-YH9 M393B1K70DH0-YH9 M393B1K70DH0-YH9 M393B1K70DH0-YH9 M393B1K70CH0-YH9 M393B1K70DH0-YH9 M393B1K70DH0-YH9 M393B1K70DH0-YH9 M393B... 80GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.3% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 16.3
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 4.7
SC Mixed 6.3
19% 6.77 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical empty Builds (Compare 558 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Empty empty

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback