Asus VivoBook 15_ASUS Laptop X540BP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus VivoBook 15_ASUS Laptop X540BP  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X540BP
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200402
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateSep 13 '22 at 07:29
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-9225 RADEON R4, 5 COMPUTE CORES 2C+3G
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
37.3% Below average
Memory 61.7
1-Core 54.2
2-Core 75.7
41% 63.9 Pts
4-Core 78.3
8-Core 72
10% 75.2 Pts
64-Core 64.5
4% 64.5 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
Asus(1043 1291) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver:
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
2.73% Terrible
Lighting 2.8
Reflection 4.5
Parallax 4
2% 3.77 fps
MRender 3.7
Gravity 3.4
Splatting 5.6
4% 4.23 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.73%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
267GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3B00101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 53 139 216 169 31 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Read 366
Write 290
Mixed 350
SusWrite 114
63% 280 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 37.3
4K Mixed 20.6
77% 26 MB/s
DQ Read 108
DQ Write 135
DQ Mixed 44.7
55% 95.7 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 102%
JetFlash Transcend 64GB
56GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 27.8
Write 0.5
Mixed 2
7% 10.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
5% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C14 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25.2% Poor
MC Read 9.5
MC Write 7.5
MC Mixed 8.9
25% 8.63 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 8.3
20% 7.03 GB/s
Latency 123
33% 123 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook 15_ASUS Laptop X540BP Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook 15_ASUS Laptop X540BP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback