Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409FL

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Tree trunk	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	14% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	31.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409FL (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X409FL
Memory	3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200429
Uptime	2.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 12 '22 at 16:56
Run Duration	232 Seconds
Run User	MYS-User
Background CPU	4%
CPU Throttled	88%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8265U 87,841 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	66.8% Good	Memory 71.3 1-Core 118 2-Core 200 73% 130 Pts	4-Core 344 8-Core 435 50% 390 Pts	64-Core 422 26% 422 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 66.8% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce MX250 8,806 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Asus(1043 118F) 2GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.1694 Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	14% Very poor	Lighting 18.7 Reflection 21.8 Parallax 16.7 15% 19.1 fps	MRender 16.1 Gravity 20.2 Splatting 8.9 12% 15.1 fps
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 14% Great: 16%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-e100n 128G 128GB 620 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 51GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0222A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 267 32 49 26 26 36 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	31.7% Below average	Read 402 Write 318 Mixed 49.8 SusWrite 72.8 46% 210 MB/s	4K Read 6.7 4K Write 22.9 4K Mixed 3.7 27% 11.1 MB/s	DQ Read 132 DQ Write 23.2 DQ Mixed 0.6 20% 51.8 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 31.7% Great: 96%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB 452,134 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 910GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 115 111 115 117 115 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	51.2% Above average	Read 64.1 Write 109 Mixed 59 SusWrite 114 64% 86.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 116% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 51.2% Great: 71%
Kingston DataTraveler 101 G2 USB 2.0 16GB-$8 3,010 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 8GB free, PID 1642 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.8 8.6 14 15 15 7.4 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	8.18% Terrible	Read 18.7 Write 9.5 Mixed 10.8 SusWrite 10.8 16% 12.4 MB/s	4K Read 4.1 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 1 73% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 8.18% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G3E1 Kingston 9905711-007.A00G 8GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 2400, 2400 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	59.2% Above average	MC Read 24.7 MC Write 20.4 MC Mixed 17 59% 20.7 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 25 SC Mixed 20.2 57% 20 GB/s	Latency 98.3 41% 98.3 ns
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 59.2% Great: 66%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409FL Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409FL

CPU
Core i5-8265UIntelBench 53%, 87,841 samples	3x

GPU
GeForce MX250NvidiaBench 14%, 8,806 samples	2x
UHD Graphics 620IntelBench 5%, 178,291 samples	1x

SSD
128G 128GBHs-ssd-e100nBench 64%, 620 samples	2x
SNVS500G 500GBKingstonBench 186%, 34,043 samples	1x

RAM
4ATF51264HZ-2G3E1 029E CMSX8GX4M1A2666C18 12GBMicronBench 49%, 6 samples	2x
4ATF51264HZ-2G3E1 Kingston 9905711-007.A00G 8GBMicronBench 62%, 13 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16