Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 53% Yacht	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 50% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	59.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

21 months ago, 21 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	40 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210320
Uptime	8 Days
Run Date	Sep 12 '22 at 02:48
Run Duration	233 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120 383,420 User benchmarks, average bench 96% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	81.6% Excellent	Memory 69.7 1-Core 142 2-Core 276 87% 162 Pts	4-Core 502 8-Core 765 79% 634 Pts	64-Core 1033 64% 1033 Pts
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 81.6% Great: 107%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$256 447,556 User benchmarks, average bench 100% Asus(1043 881D) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 512.15 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	59.1% Above average	Lighting 78 Reflection 66.5 Parallax 69 64% 71.2 fps	MRender 81.1 Gravity 58.5 Splatting 50.7 50% 63.4 fps
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 59.1% Great: 106%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$55 87,206 User benchmarks, average bench 234% 110GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,515 Write 2,242 Mixed 1,581 469% 2,113 MB/s	4K Read 63.1 4K Write 170 4K Mixed 87.9 298% 107 MB/s	DQ Read 1,005 DQ Write 965 DQ Mixed 1,083 786% 1,018 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 302%
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB 74,123 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 540GB free Firmware: 401020WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 434 440 443 440 440 443 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	99.8% Outstanding	Read 409 Write 439 Mixed 347 SusWrite 440 92% 409 MB/s	4K Read 27.3 4K Write 87.1 4K Mixed 47.7 149% 54 MB/s	DQ Read 240 DQ Write 194 DQ Mixed 203 156% 212 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 99.8% Great: 117%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$65 127,507 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 112GB free Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 87 84 86 86 86 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	34.8% Below average	Read 35.3 Write 77.2 Mixed 50.4 SusWrite 85.4 46% 62.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.9 174% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 34.8% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Patriot 3600 C20 Series 2x31.5GB 57 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 2 of 4 slots used 63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	75.5% Very good	MC Read 33.1 MC Write 19.9 MC Mixed 29.8 79% 27.6 GB/s	SC Read 21.1 SC Write 18.6 SC Mixed 25.9 62% 21.9 GB/s	Latency 102 39% 102 ns
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 75.5% Great: 119%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 4,761 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 182%

UFO

Desktop 104%

UFO

Workstation 181%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)

CPU
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $176Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	1,348x
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $240Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	1,060x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $120Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	887x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $550Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	512x
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	402x
RTX 3070-TiNvidia $449Bench 158%, 218,061 samples	364x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $105Bench 385%, 327,441 samples	440x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	386x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $159Bench 336%, 200,600 samples	207x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	158x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	126x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 101%, 32,191 samples	118x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 94% - Outstanding

Total price: $831

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359