Asus F2A85-M

Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	18.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	69.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

Motherboard	Asus F2A85-M (all builds)
Memory	6.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20140711
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Oct 25 '17 at 07:54
Run Duration	155 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-5600K APU-$250 14,744 User benchmarks, average bench 49% FM2 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4 GHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	60.3% Good	Memory 84.3 1-Core 69.2 2-Core 120 57% 91.2 Pts	4-Core 212 8-Core 215 28% 214 Pts	64-Core 214 13% 214 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 60.3% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% EVGA(3842 3751) CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 387.92 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	18.3% Very poor	Lighting 23 Reflection 17 Parallax 20.6 19% 20.2 fps	MRender 25.6 Gravity 23.5 Splatting 16.5 17% 21.9 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 18.3% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100 46,066 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 46GB free (System drive) Firmware: 506A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 102 102 6624816 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 80 80 -99394133145673 (0C) Power cycle count 94 94 6245 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 1632 (B1) Unknown 0 0 4 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 35 79 73019621411 (C2) HDA temperature 35 79 73019621411 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 6624816 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 6624816 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 6624816 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 95 95 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 23656 (EA) Unknown 0 0 11142 (F1) Unknown 0 0 11142 (F2) Unknown 0 0 23541	69.8% Good	Read 468 Write 172 Mixed 224 63% 288 MB/s	4K Read 28.9 4K Write 81.2 4K Mixed 19.8 112% 43.3 MB/s	DQ Read 148 DQ Write 198 DQ Mixed 49.9 72% 132 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 69.8% Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36 203,102 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 125GB free Firmware: CC38 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 134856358 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 80 80 21285 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 80 60 103146253 (09) Power-on hours count 81 81 17314 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 92 92 8206 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 4295032855 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 50 605356064 (C2) HDA temperature 32 50 60129542176 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 27 19 134856358 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 105179454150635 (F1) Unknown 100 253 3780114392 (F2) Unknown 100 253 3069059739	55.2% Above average	Read 99.3 Write 93 Mixed 87.6 70% 93.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 1.58 4K Mixed 0.5 106% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 55.2% Great: 70%
WD Blue 80GB (2007)-$75 3,492 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 69GB free Firmware: 05.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 161 157 2950 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 976 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 167 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 923 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 727 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 976 (C2) HDA temperature 109 92 34 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 2 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 1 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	32.1% Below average	Read 59.7 Write 51.9 Mixed 52.8 41% 54.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.55 4K Write 1.75 4K Mixed 0.27 85% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 32.1% Great: 49%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-2133C10-4GAB 8GB 32 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	35.7% Below average	MC Read 16.7 MC Write 7.2 MC Mixed 12.3 34% 12.1 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 7.5 SC Mixed 10.7 26% 9.2 GB/s	Latency 72.9 55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 35.7% Great: 41%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical F2A85-M Builds (Compare 66 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F2A85-M

CPU
A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)AMD $119Bench 50%, 18,312 samples	15x
A8-5600K APUAMD $250Bench 49%, 14,744 samples	10x
A10-6800K APU (2013 D.Ri)AMD $467Bench 51%, 11,295 samples	8x

GPU
Radeon HD 7480DAMDBench 2%, 8,289 samples	7x
Radeon HD 7660DAMDBench 5%, 7,665 samples	7x
Radeon HD 7560DAMDBench 4%, 10,029 samples	6x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x
Series SATA SSD 120GBVBench 63%, 3,411 samples	3x
R5MP120G8 120GBBench 141%, 259 samples	3x

RAM
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	5x
99U5471-030.A00LF 1x8GBKingstonBench 27%, 790 samples	4x
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 8GBUnknownBench 33%, 442 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $147

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16