Acer Aspire A315-51

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 92% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAcer Aspire A315-51  (all builds)
MotherboardKBL Venusaur_KL
Memory5.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180430
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 11 '22 at 05:33
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU0%
CPU Throttled 92%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
48.4% Average
Memory 69.4
1-Core 87.4
2-Core 149
60% 102 Pts
4-Core 150
8-Core 218
23% 184 Pts
64-Core 218
14% 218 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Acer(1025 1191) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
4.94% Terrible
Lighting 5.3
Reflection 3
Parallax 6.1
4% 4.8 fps
MRender 6
Gravity 6
Splatting 9.6
6% 7.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.94%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400S37240G 960GB
153GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61K1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 99 44 73 68 24 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 125
Write 98.6
Mixed 284
SusWrite 65.2
32% 143 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 55.6
4K Mixed 26.1
101% 35.6 MB/s
DQ Read 271
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 216
180% 258 MB/s
Poor: 46% Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905700-051.A00G 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.7% Average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 15.1
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 10.9
SC Mixed 14.3
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire A315-51 Builds (Compare 818 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A315-51

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback