Asrock X399 Taichi

Performance Results


Gaming 82% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 103% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X399 Taichi (all builds)
Memory	113 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170809
Uptime	9.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 25 '17 at 04:34
Run Duration	207 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225 23,641 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	74% Very good	Memory 64 1-Core 115 2-Core 224 73% 134 Pts	4-Core 449 8-Core 902 80% 675 Pts	64-Core 2,329 144% 2,329 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 74% Great: 85%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Zotac(19DA 1438) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 384.94 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	59.6% Above average	Lighting 74.4 Reflection 75 Parallax 65.8 61% 71.7 fps	MRender 68.3 Gravity 69.5 Splatting 72.1 58% 70 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 59.6% Great: 60%
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% PNY(196E 119E) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 384.94 Performing below potential (71^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	104% Outstanding	Lighting 135 Reflection 148 Parallax 126 110% 137 fps	MRender 110 Gravity 134 Splatting 109 96% 117 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$130 25,365 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 954GB free Firmware: EXM03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 962 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 49 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 62 60 38 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 21 (F1) Unknown 99 99 177371764	109% Outstanding	Read 521 Write 503 Mixed 512 114% 512 MB/s	4K Read 39 4K Write 95.5 4K Mixed 36.2 156% 56.9 MB/s	DQ Read 253 DQ Write 221 DQ Mixed 108 116% 194 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$130 25,365 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 727GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 966 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 48 (B1) Unknown 99 99 1 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 62 36 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 19 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1312244629	104% Outstanding	Read 523 Write 502 Mixed 508 114% 511 MB/s	4K Read 38.3 4K Write 91.5 4K Mixed 29.5 144% 53.1 MB/s	DQ Read 242 DQ Write 207 DQ Mixed 115 116% 188 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 124%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K3000 3TB-$63 6,344 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 2.5TB free Firmware: MKAOA3B0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 134 134 89 (03) Spinup time 126 126 51579781730 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1336 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 135 135 26 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 11150 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 38 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 1353 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 1353 (C2) HDA temperature 206 206 257699217437 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	87.1% Excellent	Read 155 Write 149 Mixed 110 103% 138 MB/s	4K Read 0.85 4K Write 1.21 4K Mixed 0.33 94% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 87.1% Great: 87%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K3000 3TB-$63 6,344 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 2.5TB free Firmware: MKAOA3B0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 134 134 87 (03) Spinup time 126 126 51579912807 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 4297 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 133 133 27 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 14467 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 105 (C0) Power-off retract count 97 97 4340 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 4340 (C2) HDA temperature 222 222 257699282971 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	76.3% Very good	Read 139 Write 128 Mixed 100 91% 122 MB/s	4K Read 0.28 4K Write 0.33 4K Mixed 0.47 71% 0.36 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 76.3% Great: 87%
WD VelociRaptor 1TB-$268 8,165 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 609GB free Firmware: 04.06A00 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 200 195 2958 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3440 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 198 198 344 (09) Power-on hours count 73 73 20041 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 468 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 129 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 3310 (C2) HDA temperature 119 108 31 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	80.2% Excellent	Read 139 Write 140 Mixed 140 105% 139 MB/s	4K Read 1.71 4K Write 4.19 4K Mixed 0.34 187% 2.08 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 80.2% Great: 117%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 18ASF2G72AZ-2G3B1 8x16GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 128% 8 of 8 slots used 128GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	136% Outstanding	MC Read 55.3 MC Write 53.5 MC Mixed 53.6 155% 54.1 GB/s	SC Read 15.3 SC Write 34.4 SC Mixed 21.9 68% 23.9 GB/s	Latency 116 34% 116 ns
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 136% Great: 144%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X399 Taichi Builds (Compare 565 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 99%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 120%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X399 Taichi

CPU
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD $225Bench 77%, 23,641 samples	155x
Ryzen TR 1920XAMD $800Bench 78%, 10,440 samples	115x
Ryzen TR 2950XAMD $1,075Bench 81%, 10,169 samples	104x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	47x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,198Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	36x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	27x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	38x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	28x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	20x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	13x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	12x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GBG.SKILL $139Bench 95%, 14,506 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Excellent

Total price: $916

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16