Asrock X399 Taichi

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Tree trunk	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	5.85% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	99.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X399 Taichi (all builds)
Memory	113 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170809
Uptime	9 Days
Run Date	Oct 25 '17 at 03:31
Run Duration	225 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	8%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225 23,641 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	73.5% Very good	Memory 63.4 1-Core 113 2-Core 226 72% 134 Pts	4-Core 448 8-Core 763 74% 605 Pts	64-Core 2,331 144% 2,331 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 73.5% Great: 85%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Zotac(19DA 1438) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 384.94 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	5.39% Terrible	Lighting 4.9 Reflection 8.19 Parallax 7.47 4% 6.85 fps	MRender 9.95 Gravity 9.73 Splatting 10 8% 9.9 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 5.39% Great: 60%
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% PNY(196E 119E) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 384.94 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	5.85% Terrible	Lighting 4.6 Reflection 8.96 Parallax 8.5 4% 7.35 fps	MRender 8.29 Gravity 13.3 Splatting 13.8 10% 11.8 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 5.85% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$210 25,365 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 954GB free Firmware: EXM03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 961 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 49 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 60 60 40 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 21 (F1) Unknown 99 99 169564388	108% Outstanding	Read 519 Write 497 Mixed 510 114% 509 MB/s	4K Read 37.9 4K Write 95.5 4K Mixed 34.2 152% 55.9 MB/s	DQ Read 267 DQ Write 247 DQ Mixed 113 124% 209 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$210 25,365 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 727GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 965 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 48 (B1) Unknown 99 99 1 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 62 36 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 19 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1301290831	99.6% Outstanding	Read 516 Write 497 Mixed 508 113% 507 MB/s	4K Read 35.9 4K Write 81.6 4K Mixed 27.1 132% 48.2 MB/s	DQ Read 202 DQ Write 214 DQ Mixed 97.4 104% 171 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 99.6% Great: 124%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K3000 3TB-$63 6,344 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 2.5TB free Firmware: MKAOA3B0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 134 134 89 (03) Spinup time 126 126 51579781730 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1335 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 135 135 26 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 11149 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 38 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 1352 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 1352 (C2) HDA temperature 181 181 257699217441 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	87.8% Excellent	Read 157 Write 149 Mixed 113 104% 140 MB/s	4K Read 1.19 4K Write 1.71 4K Mixed 0.46 132% 1.12 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 87.8% Great: 87%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K3000 3TB-$63 6,344 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 2.5TB free Firmware: MKAOA3B0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 134 134 87 (03) Spinup time 126 126 51579912807 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 4296 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 133 133 27 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 14466 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 105 (C0) Power-off retract count 97 97 4339 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 4339 (C2) HDA temperature 187 187 257699282976 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	91.2% Outstanding	Read 178 Write 140 Mixed 134 113% 151 MB/s	4K Read 1.12 4K Write 1.73 4K Mixed 0.46 130% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 91.2% Great: 87%
WD VelociRaptor 1TB-$268 8,165 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 609GB free Firmware: 04.06A00 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 200 195 2958 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3440 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 198 198 344 (09) Power-on hours count 73 73 20040 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 468 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 129 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 3310 (C2) HDA temperature 119 108 31 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	82.2% Excellent	Read 146 Write 139 Mixed 140 107% 142 MB/s	4K Read 1.65 4K Write 4.36 4K Mixed 0.42 196% 2.14 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 82.2% Great: 117%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 18ASF2G72AZ-2G3B1 8x16GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 128% 8 of 8 slots used 128GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	123% Outstanding	MC Read 49.3 MC Write 48.3 MC Mixed 47.7 138% 48.4 GB/s	SC Read 15.2 SC Write 33.5 SC Mixed 22.8 68% 23.8 GB/s	Latency 118 34% 118 ns
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 123% Great: 144%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X399 Taichi Builds (Compare 563 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 99%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 120%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X399 Taichi

CPU
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD $225Bench 77%, 23,641 samples	155x
Ryzen TR 1920XAMD $800Bench 78%, 10,440 samples	115x
Ryzen TR 2950XAMD $1,075Bench 81%, 10,169 samples	103x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	47x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,198Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	36x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	27x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	38x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	28x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	20x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	13x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	12x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GBG.SKILL $139Bench 95%, 14,506 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Excellent

Total price: $918

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16