Supermicro C7Z87

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics90.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive95.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSupermicro C7Z87  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro C7Z87
Memory7.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140509
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 10 '22 at 17:06
Run Duration301 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
60.9% Good
Memory 57.7
1-Core 116
2-Core 208
69% 127 Pts
4-Core 344
8-Core 589
56% 466 Pts
64-Core 596
37% 596 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$273
Asus(1043 8778) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
90.4% Outstanding
Lighting 113
Reflection 127
Parallax 110
92% 117 fps
MRender 136
Gravity 98.6
Splatting 93.5
88% 109 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$50
235GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR043
SusWrite @10s intervals: 319 377 393 400 391 360 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
95.2% Outstanding
Read 325
Write 367
Mixed 332
SusWrite 374
79% 349 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 77.1
4K Mixed 44
147% 51.3 MB/s
DQ Read 282
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 122
143% 245 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 125%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
435GB free
Firmware: HP73
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 135 135 135 136 136 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
76.1% Very good
Read 131
Write 74.2
Mixed 66.2
SusWrite 134
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 155 152 146 152 159 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
66.6% Good
Read 78.4
Write 113
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 152
73% 100 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.6
198% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 161 160 168 168 169 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Read 84.3
Write 106
Mixed 67.1
SusWrite 163
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.6
186% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$114
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 182 190 184 169 193 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 136
Mixed 65.2
SusWrite 181
100% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 101%
Great: 105%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
882GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 119 120 123 125 123 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
56.1% Above average
Read 77
Write 98.7
Mixed 64.2
SusWrite 118
66% 89.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.5
172% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 0215 CM3X2G1600C9DHX KHX1600C9D3/4GX 0215 CM3X2G1600C9DHX 12GB
1600, 1067, 1600, 1067 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
38.8% Below average
MC Read 14
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 12.5
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 12.2
37% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 135
30% 135 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical C7Z87 Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Supermicro C7Z87

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 39% - Below average Total price: $235
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback