Performance Results


Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	46.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	79.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus STRIX B250F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	4.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180904
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Sep 10 '22 at 02:30
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	SGP-User
Background CPU	99%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7600-$89 39,689 User benchmarks, average bench 72% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	62.4% Good	Memory 62.2 1-Core 73.9 2-Core 136 53% 90.6 Pts	4-Core 350 8-Core 416 50% 383 Pts	64-Core 403 25% 403 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 62.4% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 85C5) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.15 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	46.3% Average	Lighting 62.6 Reflection 59.7 Parallax 35.9 51% 52.7 fps	MRender 37.4 Gravity 33 Splatting 59.2 37% 43.2 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 46.3% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 500GB 25,072 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 239GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT21B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 337 315 303 311 320 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	79.7% Very good	Read 357 Write 341 Mixed 291 SusWrite 318 74% 327 MB/s	4K Read 20.3 4K Write 52.3 4K Mixed 29 96% 33.9 MB/s	DQ Read 384 DQ Write 344 DQ Mixed 360 271% 363 MB/s
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 79.7% Great: 131%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 461GB 42 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 429GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 50 52 46 49 47 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	69.2% Good	Read 192 Write 75 Mixed 74.1 SusWrite 49.6 72% 97.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 154% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 69.2% Great: 76%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 537GB 1,079 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 258GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 50 51 44 49 48 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	64.4% Good	Read 175 Write 168 Mixed 80.6 SusWrite 49.3 87% 118 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 141% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 64.4% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GB 122,822 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	68.2% Good	MC Read 28 MC Write 28.2 MC Mixed 23.3 76% 26.5 GB/s	SC Read 8.9 SC Write 17.8 SC Mixed 11.6 36% 12.8 GB/s	Latency 121 33% 121 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 68.2% Great: 90%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 48%

Yacht

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 41%

Speed boat

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	97x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples	81x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	59x

RAM
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	89x
BLS8G4D26BFSBK.8FBD 2x8GBCrucialBench 80%, 5,007 samples	62x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 73%, 66,222 samples	54x

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $566