Dell Precision M4600

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics0.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
21 months ago, 21 months ago.
SystemDell Precision M4600  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 08V9YG
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20180914
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 10 '22 at 01:30
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User BOL-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2640M
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
61.7% Good
Memory 86.1
1-Core 88.6
2-Core 155
66% 110 Pts
4-Core 219
8-Core 218
29% 219 Pts
64-Core 218
14% 218 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 1000M
Dell(1028 04A3) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 309.08
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.82% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 0.5
1% 1.07 fps
MRender 1.7
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 0.5
1% 1.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 0.82%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$28
200GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR054
SusWrite @10s intervals: 392 381 361 343 266 265 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
61.5% Good
Read 409
Write 337
Mixed 348
SusWrite 335
80% 357 MB/s
4K Read 12.1
4K Write 36.9
4K Mixed 9.7
50% 19.6 MB/s
DQ Read 140
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 25.8
76% 157 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 92%
Sony Storage Media 16GB
10GB free, PID 06b0
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 4.5 4.5 4 4.1 4.5 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
5.81% Terrible
Read 25.3
Write 9.5
Mixed 12.5
SusWrite 4.2
15% 12.9 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
23% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.81%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ41UF8BDU0-GN-F Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
52.6% Above average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 19.2
MC Mixed 16.8
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 16
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 71.2
56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision M4600 Builds (Compare 566 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Precision M4600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $113
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback