Asus P8B75-V

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics45.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
21 months ago, 21 months ago.
MotherboardAsus P8B75-V  (all builds)
Memory27.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140318
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 09 '22 at 23:58
Run Duration258 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
82% Excellent
Memory 90.6
1-Core 107
2-Core 195
77% 131 Pts
4-Core 405
8-Core 526
59% 465 Pts
64-Core 525
32% 525 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 82%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1286 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.5.2
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45.2% Average
Lighting 56.6
Reflection 59.7
Parallax 77.3
46% 64.5 fps
MRender 60
Gravity 58.5
Splatting 44.5
43% 54.3 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$66
314GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 119 114 134 129 134 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
59.7% Above average
Read 367
Write 346
Mixed 268
SusWrite 124
62% 276 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 66.8
4K Mixed 31.4
111% 40.5 MB/s
DQ Read 31.8
DQ Write 106
DQ Mixed 41
40% 59.5 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 130%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 77 82 83 82 81 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Read 126
Write 133
Mixed 70.7
SusWrite 79.1
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 83%
MD4000GBDS 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01K04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 131 133 136 136 135 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Read 146
Write 133
Mixed 71.1
SusWrite 133
88% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1.1
221% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 93%
WD Green 1.5TB (2009)-$150
477GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 77 82 83 82 81 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
43% Average
Read 70.4
Write 78
Mixed 57.4
SusWrite 79.1
53% 71.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 43%
Great: 55%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
845GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 114 120 121 121 121 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Read 126
Write 114
Mixed 68.6
SusWrite 118
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
193% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 76%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 12TB
8TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 30 30 30 30 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
18.7% Very poor
Read 32
Write 27.9
Mixed 25.9
SusWrite 29.8
21% 28.9 MB/s
4K Read 6.4
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.6
535% 4.3 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
59.9% Above average
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 18.7
59% 20.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 20.2
55% 19.2 GB/s
Latency 66.3
60% 66.3 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8B75-V Builds (Compare 1,148 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-V

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $442
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback