Lenovo 11DA002TIX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics44.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
21 months ago, 21 months ago.
SystemLenovo 11DA002TIX  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3168
Memory26.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colori,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220715
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateSep 09 '22 at 21:02
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400-$124
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
83% Excellent
Memory 87.8
1-Core 122
2-Core 207
80% 139 Pts
4-Core 421
8-Core 779
72% 600 Pts
64-Core 953
59% 953 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 83%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Asus(1043 8772) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
44.3% Average
Lighting 55.4
Reflection 80.6
Parallax 57.6
45% 64.5 fps
MRender 64.3
Gravity 49.7
Splatting 45.8
43% 53.3 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 46%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SKHynix_HFS256GD9TNI-L2B0B 256GB
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11710C10
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1076
Write 1,524
Mixed 1,093
277% 1,231 MB/s
4K Read 52.8
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 69.8
235% 81.9 MB/s
DQ Read 900
DQ Write 745
DQ Mixed 743
578% 796 MB/s
Poor: 91% Great: 210%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43EB2-CWE Kingston 9905702-011.A00G Hynix HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF Kingston 9905702-014.A00G 32GB
3200, 2400, 2133, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
70.4% Very good
MC Read 25.3
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 22
71% 24.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 29.1
SC Mixed 22
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 69.8
57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 11DA002TIX Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 11DA002TIX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $124
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback